Katherine Frisk note:
It does not surprise me that Georgetown University supports a covert group of operatives such as the White Helmets in Syria who claim to be aiding the “rebels,” when in fact they are aiding nobody but instead are supporting extremist Islamic barbaric groups who have a habit of chopping off the heads of young children.
The WH have been producing propaganda claiming to conduct rescue missions but much of the footage that they have produced has proved to be fake and engineered.
Georgetown University is a Roman Catholic Institution run by Jesuits as are many schools and collages across the USA. Since the Illuminati was founded in the late 1800s, there has been a purposeful plan to infiltrate all sectors of the predominantly Protestant USA and turn it into another Roman Catholic subject of the Vatican over the last 130 years. Jesuit priests at Georgetown University have been trained in all religions and have infiltrated ever single denomination including New Age groups. As they have with Freemasonry across the USA and subverted it to Illuminati doctrine. No real Freemason will give allegiance to the Pope or advocate a Luciferian doctrine.
What is the difference between the Latin Roman Church and the eastern Orthodox Church and the Protestant Religions?
The former is a unipolar construct where the Pope is the highest authority, considers himself Christ’s representative on earth where you can only be saved through him and according to them and their papal bulls written in the last 1,000 years, the Pope owns the planet, all bodies on the planet and all souls.
The latter are a multi-polar construct based on all twelve disciples where nobody has the audacity to claim the role of Christ and no single entity or organization owns the planet, all bodies on the planet and all souls. According to Acts and the original Apostolic church we are saved and guided through the Holy Spirit. No single Apostle has supremacy over any other.
Today we see these constructs playing out on the world stage, with the NWO, one world government and a corporate fascist globalist economic structure with trade agreements like the TPP and the TTIP that over ride nation-state sovereignty, as opposed to a multi-polar world where Nation States retain their independence and corporations are subject to the laws of that country ( wage laws, health regulations, environmental standards) as opposed to dictating their own terms and conditions.
The NWO is not dissimilar to the feudal system, where all property was owned by the nobility and the church. Investors and the CEOs in these corporations which are all interconnected and control over 40% of the world’s economy, come from the Black Nobility of Europe and include investments made by the Vatican Bank.
The most obvious examples of the rising tide against the NWO, which is not dissimilar to the religious wars that raged throughout Europe with the rise of the Protestant Reformation, are the many countries we see today who want to break away from the EU and reclaim their independence and Nation State sovereignty. Greece, Holland, Britain, France. Contrary to the statements made by Martin Shultz, the crowds ( voters), actually do want to decide their own fate and what is more believe that they are entitled to do so. All members of the EU parliament are not elected but are appointed by the Banks and the Corporations and to do represent the people of Europe. The direct descendant of the Holy Roman Emperor, appointed by the Pope, is the current King of Belgium. Again it is not surprising that the centre of the EU is in Brussels.
The same revolution is occurring in the USA where Americans are taking their country back from the Bush/Clinton double-edged sword that has been a dictatorship since the 1990s controlled by the Fed, the Bilderberg Group, the Illuminati, the P2 lodge Black Nobility and ultimately the Jesuits and the Vatican. It was no co-incidence that the Jesuit Pope addressed Congress in 2015 for the first time in America’s history. This runs counter to the Constitution and the Founding Fathers who were Protestants, Quakers and Huguenots, many of whom had escaped Europe for the new world and the Inquisition of the Jesuits and the roman Catholic Church.
Syria is not part of the NWO construct, which has brought it into the line of fire of the NWO as they go marching across the world in search of world domination these days fueled by Soros funded “color revolutions,”regime change and proxy armies, which in turn is in keeping with the Papal Bulls. Of note during this horrific war that has lasted since 2011, is the persecution of Orthodox Christians, not only in Syria, but in Egypt and Libya. Proxy armies funded, trained, armed and assisted by the CIA founded by Prescott Bush and George Bush senior, which answers to the Vatican.
In lslam it is the difference between the Shia democratic system seen in Syria and Iran as opposed to the Sunni Saudi Royals in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Bahrain. In Judaism it is the difference between the Torah Jews and the Zionist Khazar Babylonian Talmud faction from eastern Europe.
Prescott Bush was a Nazi supporter before and during WW2. The Vatican supported the Nazis. The Nazis and the Muslim Brotherhood which you see today in Daesh/ISIS, were in an alliance during WW2, as were the Zionists who founded the current state of Israel. Which also goes to explain Israel’s support for Daesh/ ISIS on the Golan heights.
In Biblical terms this equates with the alliance between Caiaphas the High priest of the temple, the Edomite Arab Herodian Kings and Pilate, the Roman Legion. The same groups who persecuted Jesus, the Apostles and the early Christian Church under James the Righteous, the first Bishop of the church and the brother of Jesus, led by the Holy Spirit. In Judaism, Christianity and Islam the two sides are the difference between self-empowerment and enfranchisement as opposed to autocracy and slavery of the masses.
The White Helmets in turn, are a covert group of subversives who have been assisting these proxy armies in Syria, and are supported by Georgetown University. … which is not surprising.
by J. Michael Springmann, Global Research:
On November 14, 2016, Georgetown’s Foreign Service School, its Center for Contemporary Arab Studies (CCAS), and its Middle East-North Africa (MENA) Forum showed the Netflix propaganda film “The White Helmets”. Following the film (which the Helmets had shot), there was an extremely biased panel discussion about current Syrian events.
The motion picture, well-received by the audience, offered a carefully-edited account of the White Helmets, an alleged civil defense and rescue group. No member had any kind of background involving rescue work. Indeed, they all seemed to be either butchers, bakers, or candlestick makers. One alleged he had been a terrorist but had reformed and now wanted to help his fellow countrymen. The film depicted the White Helmets rescuing infants at great risk while under fire from the Syrian government and Russia. The only training they received was in Turkey, coming from classes and drills which the Anatolian government provided.
After the picture, the CCAS Director, Osama Abi-Mershed, praising the White Helmets’ work, introduced the following panel members:
- Marwa Daoudy. Assistant Professor at CCAS and the School of Foreign Service. Previously she had had ties to Harvard and Princeton Universities and the US government-connected Middle East Institute. She is deeply involved in work on national security and Middle East politics.
- Rafif Jouejati. A “management consultant”, she joined the “Syrian revolution for democracy, dignity, and freedom in March 2011″. Jouejati had been a spokesman for the formal Syrian opposition coalition during the 2014 Geneva peace talks. She is also a director of FREE-Syria.
- Kenan Rahmani. Policy Advisor at the Syria Campaign. A Syrian-American activist, he spends time in north Syria working with civil society groups, including the White Helmets.
- Raed al-Saleh. Head of the Syria Civil Defense (i.e., White Helmets). The claim is that its 3,000 volunteers have saved over 72,000 lives. They were nominated for the 2016 Nobel Peace Prize and have received the Atlantic Council’s Freedom Award as well as the Middle East Institute’s Visionary Award. (N.B., the Atlantic Council’s chairman is a former governor of Utah and past ambassador. Zalmay Khalilzad, one-time ambassador to Afghanistan, Iraq, and the UN, is a director. The Middle East Institute is loaded with former ambassadors and other US government officials.)
After the film, Raed al-Saleh, refused entry to the US in April 2016, and Rafif Jouejati, expanded on the US government’s deceits about Syria’s legitimate government, Russia, and Iran. Ably assisted by Kenan Rahmani and Prof. Marwa Daoudy at CCAS, the group promoted the most outrageous falsehoods about US efforts to overthrow Syria’s regime. They also refused to accept the results of November 8′s US general election and urged the students to protest a suddenly racist and hate-filled America.
Cheered on by at least 200 impressionable students, the group arrogantly and openly lied about events in Syria, asserting that that country’s government and Russia were bombing schools and hospitals. The panel members claimed that Bashar al-Assad had used chlorine and other poisonous gases in attacks on Syrian “freedom fighters”. Jouejati alleged that she and her groups believed in non-violence and that the Syrian government had forced the closure of most of their offices. She insisted their members had been targeted for retaliation, while Rahmani said that the Syrians themselves should decide their own future. Daoudy asserted that the US election had shocked the Syrians Rahmani, in a remarkable statement, charged that Islamists were happy the US elected Trump, thus proving democracy doesn’t work.
He also declared that the Russians, Trump’s allies, have killed more civilians than ISIS. Continuing, he averred that Trump opposed all people of color, Jews, essentially, anyone different from him. Jouejati went on to say that Assad must go and that the choice is not him or the extremists. Al-Saleh not only attacked Russia and Assad but also Hezbollah and Iran for helping prop up the Syrian government. He avowed that Idlib, where he was from, was a multi-religious, multi-ethnic community.
In response to the author’s one question about the White Helmets’ questionable connections: to British intelligence, to NATO, to the US Agency for International Development, and Jabhat al-Nusra, al-Saleh launched an ad hominem attack. Ignoring the author’s references to Vanessa Beeley’s and Max Blumenthal’s analyses, al-Saleh denied his removal from the US, his group’s cache of weapons, and his ties to terrorism. The audience cheered.
The author had no chance to respond.
CCAS allowed only two other, extremely mundane questions. They included praise for the “heroic” White Helmets.
In keeping with the propaganda aspect of the operation, a woman came up to the author afterwards with a remarkable story. In it, she noted that she had been blocked from distributing a flyer referring to the White Helmets’ questionable nature. Her offense? The paper listed titles and authors of news articles about the Helmets’ hoax. One described the White Helmets as “al-Qaeda with a face-lift”.
Certainly, throughout the two and one half hours, no one said a word about al-Saleh’s support for a “no-fly zone” over Syria. (Max Blumenthal had termed this concept a prelude to “regime change”.) The White Helmets have other problems which Georgetown University never addressed. As Christina Lin wrote in the Asia Times, there are photos and videos of “White Helmet members carrying weapons, celebrating with Al Qaeda when they defeat the Syrian army in battles, and standing by to watch as rebel jihadists conduct executions and then immediately rushing forward to place the body in body bags.”
An RT interview with journalist Vanessa Beeley noted that ” They provide medical care for the terrorists, they funnel equipment in from Turkey into the terrorist areas (…) They’ve been filmed participating and facilitating an execution of a civilian in Aleppo [Halab]. They post celebratory videos to their social media pages of the execution of civilian Arab soldiers. From the testimony from the real Syria Civil Defense across Syria they have also been involved in the taking over of the real Syria Civil Defense units, the stealing of their equipment and the eventual massacres and kidnapping of real Syria Civil Defense crews.”
Oh, yes, to help facilitate Syrian all this, they receive millions of dollars in government funding. It comes from the United States, Great Britain, Germany, and France. The White Helmets operate only in areas controlled by terrorist groups such as Jabhat al-Nusra.
Naturally, not one word came from the panel about the White Helmets’ origins. Scott Ritter, former weapons inspector in Iraq, did shine some light on their murky beginnings. He said: “The organizational underpinnings of the White Helmets can be sourced to a March 2013 meeting in Istanbul between a retired British military officer, James Le Mesurier—who had experience in the murky world of private security companies and the shadowy confluence between national security and intelligence operations and international organizations—and representatives of the Syrian National Council (SNC) and the Qatari Red Crescent Society.” Le Mesurier had also operated in Iraq and Yugoslavia.
A Yugoslav source suggested that Syria’s White Helmet concept may have grown out of NATO’s destruction of her country. Then, the EU had provided civilian “white helmets” to help monitor the situation there. They were supposedly professionals needed as a standby force in post-conflict situations. As set forth in a South African publication, ACCORD, “They [the helmets] would mobilise in the field of emergency humanitarian assistance and the gradual transition from relief to rehabilitation, reconstruction and development.”
Furthermore, our source noted that while she was in the country, the Yugoslav white helmets always seemed to be tied to CIA operational areas. They also stirred up conflicts in locations supposedly being pacified, she said. Calling them “very empowered criminals”, our contact added that they always enjoyed a rank far above the UN officials and other aid workers.
It’s one thing for Georgetown University officials to foist this off on their students as Syrian current events. It’s another for the students to sit there and swallow it. A former professor at Georgetown clarifies this. Nicholas Greenwood Onuf once said that Georgetown. a Catholic Cow College [down-market school], has students that can’t or won’t think.