God in Politics or a Godless World: Time to Choose

The geo-political struggle between so-called “globalists” and their nationalistic (populist) counterparts has reached a feverish pitch. With trust and belief systems in the crucible, everything from our economic beliefs to our spirituality is up for grabs. At the center of all this, America’s President Donald Trump and the Russian Federation’s President Vladimir Putin stand out as media targets and as gladiators against a kind of neo-liberal hysteria. Here are some thoughts on the globalist order and on the incontrovertible role conflict we just recognize – our religiousness is being fundamentally challenged.

by Phil Butler, NEO: 

The Americans for Putin Facebook profile has 3060 “likes”. The Vladimir Putin Fan Club on Facebook has 122,196 members. On Instagram, Twitter, VK, and a dozen more social media outlets thousands of Putin fan profiles exist, with millions on millions of followers. Furthermore, a new Gallop poll being broadcast via mainstream media, Mr. Putin’s approval rating is up among Americans most recently. The media in America and Europe would like to attribute this popularity to the Trump election win, but the Russian president’s favor with millions of Americans has nothing to do with Trump or being Republican. Bear with me and I’ll explain why Vladimir Putin is more popular than you imagine.

Mr. Putin’s popularity has many facets, not the least of which is the perception that the Russian president is what Americans would call “a straight shooter”. In this, Putin is joined by Donald Trump for the latter’s “off the cuff” plain speak. But besides the lingo and tone these two exhibit, a more fundamental shared ideal appeal to the biggest demographic set of all in America – Christians. If we look at both Putin and Trump, we can see a kind of cohesiveness between the America leader and Russia’s president via religion and spirituality as well. Let’s look at something Mr. Putin said in a state of the union speech in 2014:

“Many Euro-Atlantic countries have moved away from their roots, including Christian values. Policies are being pursued that place on the same level a multi-child family and a same-sex partnership, a faith in God and a belief in Satan. This is the path to degradation.”

I can assure you, such statements resonate with Americans who have access to them. While the far left condemns any synergy of political will and religiosity, separating church and state has nothing to do with ignoring tradition and values. That separation is needed as a check and balance of control, nothing more. The danger in the 21st century is not the undue influence of God (however defined and worshipped) but the antithesis of spirituality. Billions and billions of people believe in something higher and better than self or government, and the new liberals evangelize belief in extant humanity, and nothing more. In a very real way, the neo-liberal political philosophy is a return to beastlike ideals – at least for devout believers. Without straining geo-political theory to its extremes, looking at Donald Trump’s support base and at his rhetoric, it bears fruit here. It’s a stark irony here that the Jeff Bezos’ far left bull horn The Washington Post cites Trump religious penchant from his inauguration speech:

When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice. The Bible tells us how good and pleasant it is when God’s people live together in unity. We must speak our minds openly, debate our disagreements honestly, but always pursue solidarity.”

Now the WP wanted to insinuate Donald Trump as some kind of self-proclaimed “demi-god” in their story, but sometimes the truth is used to create a great lie too. But when Trump said of America’s children, “they are infused with the breath of life by the same almighty creator,” he mirrored the longstanding essence of Vladimir Putin. For the left, the agnostics and atheists both Trump and Putin are a real enemy in their eyes. Much was made of Trump failing to mention “non-believers”, in the same way the world LGBT community railed at Mr. Putin over freedoms to march in the streets in front of little kids. To understand how world policies and ideas are in conflict, we must use plain language and forget political correctness. Mr. Putin has done this, and so has President Trump. So should we all.

My point here is simple. America and Russia are two nations founded on Christian principles. There, I said it. Christian principles have guided both these nations throughout their histories. But the question; “What are these principles, and how do they fit into a political context?” are logical. This goes to the heart of the matter of our current crises actually, if you’ll allow me to explain.

75% of Americans today identify with a Christian religion, down from 80% when Barack Obama took office. Russia shows essentially the same religiosity footprint, with somewhere between 60% and 75% identifying with Orthodoxy or another form of Christian faith. Russia, it should be mentioned, is far more difficult to measure officially, as governmental numbers do not even exist for such things. Based on the hundreds of Russians in my own network, these numbers seem to fit. Regardless of the minute fraction of deviation, it’s completely fair to call either of these nations “predominantly religious”. Where the problem of religiosity arises is in the rule of law and within the structure of democratic thought. You see many people confuse “religious freedom” with the intent of the framers of the US constitution of creating “religious tolerance”. And it is in the latter term we can finally converge on the truth of either nation’s idealistic path.

America is a nation based on Christian values and principles. Were it not, not a living soul of another faith would walk among my people. We do not have to examine New Testament scripture for long to discover religious tolerance. I will quote Jesus here once, and only once. Romans 14:1-4 reads:

“As for the one who is weak in faith, welcome him, but not to quarrel over opinions.  One person believes he may eat anything, while the weak person eats only vegetables. Let not the one who eats despise the one who abstains, and let not the one who abstains pass judgment on the one who eats, for God has welcomed him.  Who are you to pass judgment on the servant of another? It is before his own master that he stands or falls. And he will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make him stand.”

People in the United States are not taught to cast out people of other faiths. Christianity, like many religions, is based on a belief in love and hope. It is interesting that both Mr. Putin and Mr. Trump have spoken on this very subject. But discussions of minute faith and the doctrines etc. have no place here except to illustrate a point of current ideological crisis. Putin and Trump, their supporters (including me) exert a frustration and fearfulness that core principles are being assailed.

The Globalists are led by notorious atheists and agnostics for the most part. The current West-East divide brought on by the Obama administration’s push to complete the globalist doctrine, it is a movement bent on the destruction of all traditions that stand in the way of one flawed model of “Cosmopolitanism”. The George Soros types of this world believe (or profess to believe) humanity should be one community with one shared sense of morality. The problem is, the morality they seek to stamp into our foreheads is a faithless, godless one. The Neo-Left is about human gods, and a world where permissiveness is bastardized from tolerance and patience.

Make no mistake here, the globalist doctrine leaders like Angel Merkel, banking elites like the Rothschilds, or even Saudi Sheiks adhere to and promote is not based on a hopeful and humane rule of laws. The “morality” these influential players seek is their idea of right and wrong – their notion of social justice disguised like always, as a Utopia where anything goes – an ethnocentric ideal where carte blanche is issued to everyone.

This is the same paradigm that has always existed in international and national relations and politics. The crux of my argument here can be gleaned by reading this Bill Moyers story about rules for religion in politics. At a point Moyers turns talks about the interests of the minority of agnostics, atheists, and humanists in insuring discussions of religion in politics become more “delicate and dangerous”, as Moyers puts it. The political correctness of the far left, as President Trump so often says, is central to America’s internal divisions now. In no realm is this truer than the religious-political realm. Quoting Thomas Land of Emory University’s Candler School of Theology, Moyers reveals the inextricable reality:

“Atheists, as well as agnostics, skeptics, and humanists, have a huge stake in how religion plays out in our democracy and are making their voices heard—“smashing idols in the sanctuary,” as Land writes in Christian Century.”

The philosophical roots of “Cosmopolitanism” are quite wonderful actually.  Diogenes of Sinope (c. 412 B.C.), who was the founding father of the Cynic movement in Ancient Greece,  and his ideas of being a “citizen of the world” gave way to what is known as “Stoic cosmopolitanism”, or a self image emanating outward to other people with a feeling of affinity and endearment. This form of Stoicism is supposed to lead to a higher form of existence called oikeiosis, or family basically. The problem in the neo-liberal and globalist sense is, the head of this new family is not God the father or Buddha even, but some Frankfurt banker or Washington think tank guru. The hierarchy the Soros and Rockefeller types condone is one made in their own image. And that image has no place for what they perceive as our petty faith in a universal good. Set against this warped humanist ideal are a very few religious leaders.

And so much for political correctness…

Phil Butler, is a policy investigator and analyst, a political scientist and expert on Eastern Europe, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.



7 thoughts on “God in Politics or a Godless World: Time to Choose

  1. Good article. Looks like Diogenes was a Sabbatean-Frankist (didn’t come for 1900 more years, though…). ‘Dio’ is associated with Saturn. Later became associated with Mithraism. Mithraism artifacts are found in the ‘Diocleation Baths museum. Barry Chamish said that Sabbatean-Frankism was seeded from Mithraism and other stuff. This Diogene guy is clearly ‘the other stuff.’ He worshiped many gods, so a Kabbala guy. Don’t see any differences between Diogene and Sabbatai Zevi, or Jacob Frank. Satanism. Thought by some that ‘Frankism’ was the religion of Babylon. Even so, in his mind, he was ‘freeing souls.’

    Pretty funny. He walked around in the daytime with a lantern while ‘looking for an honest man.’ He was mocking the Greek God while shaving coins, which might be metaphor for debasing the currency. Bankers…

    Thanks for writing. Very enlightening.


  2. The problem for both the United States and Russia (and for the world in general) is that traditional religions are “out of sync” with 21st century conditions of existence and are perceived as “irrelevant” to a growing number of people (as evidenced by the growing decline in religious affiliation — especially in the developed countries of the world). More than ever, people need a sensible set of beliefs and values that help them make the most of life and the world around them. Unfortunately neither religion nor atheism are addressing these concerns. Religion is “out of sync”— and “atheism focuses on what NOT to believe instead of offering a sensible doctrine of WHAT to believe”. As such, the developed world is operating largely in a “vacuum of values”. What is needed — instead of an “empty void” — is a “sensible alternative” — one that focuses on developing human potential and making the most of life and the world around us (see http://www.potentialistmovement.com). The common thread is that most people are interested in fulfilling their human potential rather than debating loyalties to some form of supernatural force or not. To continue to believe that the battle is between “traditional religion” or “no religion” serves no useful purpose, because the real challenge is to come up with a sensible 21st century philosophy for making the most of life (whether that is called a “new religion”, a “philosophy”, or “world view”) that is packaged in a way that people can understand and resonates with the needs of 21st century people. A “new option” is vitally needed rather than a choice between 2 existing options — neither or which is working.


    • Agreed. But the reason why religion is no longer talking to the people is because in all the texts there is a duplicity and a melding together of two opposing ideologies that contradict each other and not only incorporate a duplicity in the nature of “God,”however you may view it, but in political, social and economic structures that are a result of a certain mindset. People are expected to take on faith that both are valid. Psychologically this causes cognitive dissonance. Instinctively any person would know that something is wrong and just does not gel, but they cannot put their finger on it. It they could, it would change their whole view and understanding.

      As one example of many, in Judaism, Christianity and Islam, and which effects all three. In Genesis 1 we are told that we are made in the image of God, both male and female and within the symbolic 7 day number. The name for God in Hebrew in Genesis 1 is Elohim who creates the whole universe and the earth. This is the same are the Chinese ying/ yang. El is masculine and Ohim is feminine. Biologically this is an accurate description of all childbirth where the child is made in the image of both parents. There is no sin in this creation. This concept is again explored in Proverbs 8 and in Revelation. The Bible ends in a wedding between the Bride, the Holy city and the Great Judge who comes to judge the nations. Alpha and Omega. Most notable about the Holy City is that there is no temple and all nations are welcome.

      Turn to Genesis 2 and you have a demi-God who makes a man out of clay. And then makes a woman from his rib. These two are not created within the symbolic seven day period but outside of it, and we are told that they are the only human beings that have been created. There is no feminine part in this act. Only male. What is more this couple are then, in spite of there actually being other people on the earth, considered to be a specific blood line of one family. One nation, one people and one race group. And they are sinful because they create, if anything it is stressed that childbirth will be suffering not joy. The Bible does not end with this potter god. Or a return to his paradise.

      People for over 2,000 years have been taught that both stories are valid and to accept them on faith. As Jesus himself said, you cannot serve two masters for you will betray one of them. He also said that you need to sift the chaff form the wheat. This same duplicity runs throughout the Old Testament, the New Testament and the Quran. from beginning to the end. The intelligence community has a very good term for it. Poisoning the well. Or in todays climate, fake news and propaganda mixed in with the truth.

      Here is another one for you. We are told repeatedly that Noah cursed the sons of Ham, African. But if you read the text, Noah did not curse the sons of Ham. He only cursed Canaan. Canaan was the father of the Canaanites, who were a Semitic people. But nobody bothers to point this out and they take what has been dished out to them from the pulpit on faith. And what is more, Noah married Enoch’s daughter. She was Ethiopian. He was considered one of the Righteous because he had only one wife, and they went into the Ark two by two, not one plus 10 females. Some Bible scholars have attempted to make her out to be a second or third wife. God in Genesis 1 is not one plus ten. It is one and one. Their creation forms the ever present Holy Trinity in all religions. Father, mother and child. The Holy Spirit, as in Wisdom in Proverbs 8, the Wisdom of Solomon 9 and the Bride in Revelation is female.

      For the last 2,000 years society has been by and large misogynist, elitist and racist. With the emphasis on Genesis 2.

      Jesus did not tell you to be stupid. He told you to be as wise as a serpent and as gentle as a dove. And learn to discern. Really reading the Bible is a good exercise in discernment. It is as relevant today as when it was written.

      This might interest you: https://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Was-Palestinian-Katherine-Frisk/dp/1517155789/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1457226848&sr=1-1&keywords=Katherine+Frisk


  3. I sense that you are so versed in biblical terms that you are unable to set the warring philosophies aside and see what is really happening. A “fresh start” is required and a whole new 21st century belief and value system is required in order to provide a world view that people can relate to. Such a philosophy no longer depends upon fanciful stories of supernatural forces being in charge. Instead it recognizes that “nature is neither kind nor cruel but impartial” … and life offers but one thing — the opportunity for us to make of it what we will. SELF, SOCIETY, & ENVIRONMENT are totally intertwined and interdependent upon each other and we as humankind are responsible for all three. Then it’s a matter of constructing rational well-thought-out beliefs, values, and responsibilities for all three.

    Since it is up to us make of life what we will and to determine what makes life “meaningful”, then the best goal is the fulfillment and “self-actualization” of human potential in constructive ways. It is up to us to develop ourselves to our full potential and shape the world into what it too has the full potential to become. The fate of the world rests in our hands. We have to develop a new 2s1t century world view that provides the foundation upon which people can work in harmony with each other to achieve our common goal of developing and applying human potential for the benefit of all concerned.


    • I sense that you are not paying attention and that you are on your own mission. How much do you charge by the way? And how much will it cost me to sign up?


  4. Not paying attention ? To what ? Just don’t see the need to waste time on that which isn’t working. Yes … you might say that I am on a mission. I am proposing the new option that is needed — a new 21st century outlook on life and the world view that accompanies it. See http://www.potentialistmovement.com. No charge — be in touch if what is presented resonates.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s