The Imperative of Replacing Google and Facebook

Katherine Frisk note: I often watch live chat lines and sometimes join in. There are people in those chat lines who are trained to use paraphrases that will move the conversation away from anything intelligent and constructive and instigate religious, social, economic or political dissent. It is their job, and it really does not matter what religion, race or political view they might personally have, they are paid a lot of money to instigate chaos and sometimes even take on two or three character names at a time and argue with themselves in order to stop any real discussions from taking place

One example was Donetsk. There was a 24/7 live feed coming out of the city in 2014. What I learnt from the real people, was that many of them ended up torn between both sides in the civil war. Many people in Ukraine are related and have family in both eastern and western Ukraine.They were torn and split apart by political events under which they never had any control. 2014 was a coup instigated by the US under the leadership of Victoria Nuland, Joe Biden, Lindsey Graham and John McCain.

The heartbreak of these stories never sees the light of day in any media, but I found some of the people whose families had been destroyed on chat sites, and often they found each other. Left alone they would have resolved the situation long ago.

But instigators were planted not only on the ground, but across social media in order to make sure that would never happen and that nobody got a chance to compare notes, expose the truth or ever find resolutions from grass-roots level upwards. A large majority of them would never have fought and killed each other.

Social media helped to ensure that the situation was always injected with venom, inflammatory statements and below the belt remarks,  personal insults as a last resort against  anyone who contradicted them. When all else fails, attack the person instead of discussing the subject. Google and Facebook played a major role. The same can be said for Syria, as Tony Cartalucci outlines below.


by Tony Cartalucci, NEO:  

Nations are beginning to take more seriously the control of their respective information space after years of allowing US-based tech giants Google and Facebook to monopolize and exploit them. Vietnam, according to a recent GeekTime article, is the latest nation to begin encouraging local alternatives to the search engine and social media network in order to rebalance the monopoly over information both tech giants enjoy in the Southeast Asian country today.

Google and Facebook: More than Search Engines and Social Media

The two tech giants and others like them may have appeared at their inceptions to political, business, and military leaders around the world as merely opportunistic corporations seeking profits and expansion.

However, Google and Facebook, among others, have become clearly much more than that.

Both have verifiably worked with the US State Department in pursuit of geopolitical objectives around the world, from the collapse of the Libyan government to attempts at regime change in Syria, and using social media and information technology around the world to manipulate public perception and achieve sociopolitical goals on behalf of Wall Street and Washington for years.

The use of social media to control a targeted nation’s information space, and use it as a means of carrying out sociopolitical subversion and even regime change reached its pinnacle in 2011 during the US-engineered “Arab Spring.”

Portrayed at first as spontaneous demonstrations organized organically over Facebook and other social media platforms, it is now revealed in articles like the New York Times’, “U.S. Groups Helped Nurture Arab Uprisings,” that the US government had trained activists years ahead of the protests, with Google and Facebook participating directly in making preparations.

Opposition fronts funded and supported by the US State Department’s National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and its subsidiaries Freedom House, International Republican Institute (IRI), and National Democratic Institute (NDI) were invited to several summits where executives and technical support teams from Google and Facebook provided them with the game plans they would execute in 2011 in coordination with US and European media who also attended the summits.

The end result was the virtual weaponization of social media, serving as cover for what was a long-planned, regional series of coups including heavily armed militants who eventually overthrew the governments of Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, and Yemen, with Syria now locked in 6 years of war as a result.

It was during Syria’s ongoing conflict that Google would find itself involved again. The Guardian in a 2012 article titled, “Syria: is it possible to rename streets on Google Maps?,” would report:

In their struggle to free Syria from the clutches of President Bashar al-Assad, anti-government activists have embarked on a project to wipe him off the map. Literally. On Google Maps, major Damascus thoroughfares named after the Assad family have appeared renamed after heroes of the uprising. The Arab Spring has form in this regard. When anti-Gadaffi rebels tore into Tripoli last August, the name of the city’s main square on the mapping service changed overnight – from “Green Square”, the name given to it by the erstwhile dictator, to “Martyr’s Square”, its former title.

The internet giant’s mapping service has a history of weighing in on political disputes.

Google’s monopoly in nations without local alternatives ensures that public perception is lopsidedly influenced by these deceptive methods.

The Independent in a 2016 article titled, “Google planned to help Syrian rebels bring down Assad regime, leaked Hillary Clinton emails claim,” would expand on Google’s activities regarding Syria:

An interactive tool created by Google was designed to encourage Syrian rebels and help bring down the Assad regime, Hillary Clinton’s leaked emails have reportedly revealed. 

By tracking and mapping defections within the Syrian leadership, it was reportedly designed to encourage more people to defect and ‘give confidence’ to the rebel opposition.

Clearly, more is going on at Google than Internet searches.

Nations would be equally irresponsible to allow a foreign corporation to exercise control over their respective information space – especially in light of verified, documented abuses – as they would by allowing foreign corporations to exercise control over other essential aspects of national infrastructure.

Vietnam Taking Control of its Information Space 

The GeekTime article, shared by the US State Department’s NDI on Twitter titled, “Is Vietnamese campaign to build a Facebook alternative fighting fake news, or fostering censorship?,” claims (emphasis added):

During a parliamentary committee meeting earlier this month, Truong Minh Tuan, Minister of Information and Communications in Vietnam, said that the government is encouraging Vietnamese tech companies to build local replacements for platforms such as Facebook and Google (which are the most popular in their categories in Vietnam). 

The article also reported:

It is part of a wider campaign to “strengthen cyber security” and the integrity of the country’s information. “The plan is to try and address the problem of how ‘fake pages’ with anti-government content grew uncontrollably on Facebook,” said Tuan. “Going further, we need social networks provided by local businesses that can replace and compete with Facebook in Vietnam.”

NDI’s mention of the article is meant to imply that the Vietnamese government stands to profit from the localization of search engines and social media – and it does. However, the localization of Vietnam’s information space is no different than the localization of Vietnam’s defense industry, energy and water infrastructure, schools, and healthcare institutions. They are the Vietnamese people’s to control, not Washington, Wall Street, or Silicon Valley’s.

Whether the Vietnamese government abuses that localization or not is the business of the Vietnamese people. The actual concern NDI has is that once the localization of information technology is complete in Vietnam, forever will these effective vectors of sociopolitical subversion be closed to the corporate-financier special interests driving US foreign policy and the work of fronts like NDI.

Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazine New Eastern Outlook”.


3 thoughts on “The Imperative of Replacing Google and Facebook

  1. All you mention and more. Google and Facebook were founded with CIA money. Their staffs are infected with the same types who control mainstream media (corporate and indie). They all can quickly march in lockstep to promote fake news, while claiming to fight fake news, and have spread their damage into youtube and all other sites, manipulating hits and likes on stories, or totally burying them. “Google maps” records every inch of our planet and space, painting targets, while deleting elements they don’t want seen, like secret bases and space anomolies, and renaming streets as you mention. A very secret element in Google actively works with, supports and basically are, mercenary fighters. I believe it’s called “Google Works”. Both sites look harmless on our screens, as part of the banality of evil, but tech was founded to further the spying web on us all. They record and file every word and keystroke that has ever been. No secret as to how they got hyper rich, as they likely see every plan, stock trade and political move long before it happens and most certainly as it happens.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s